Also remove a call to 'git config --unset difftool.prompt', since that is
already unset by restore_test_defaults.
Acked-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also prefix several relevant git merge commands with 'test_must_fail' to
keep the tests passing.
Acked-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also move repeated tag and branch deletions into a separate setup test, to
avoid failures from tags and branches having already been deleted.
Acked-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also add a couple test_must_fail invocations where needed, and avoid
one-shot environment variable export and function calls.
Acked-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ever since 8b12413 (color: allow multiple attributes 2010-02-27),
diff.color.new has been unused in t4026, so also remove the final unsetting
of that value to make the third to last test pass with appropriate
'&&' chaining.
Acked-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also add test_might_fail in front of the git_config --unset commands that
may be trying to unset a value that never got set (due to a previous
failing test) or that were already unset.
Acked-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also replace '|| return 1' by '&&' to allow chain of operations to be
checked for proper return status, and modify the update-index command
as suggested by Jonathan Nieder to not exit early but try to make sure
files that match the work tree are marked as matching.
Acked-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also, replace "|| return 1" with "&&" in order to keep commands chained.
Acked-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit takes advantage of Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason's recent change
to test_expect_code (test-lib: make test_expect_code a test command) to
simplify several testcases.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change test_expect_code to be a normal test command instead of a
top-level command.
As a top-level command it would fail in cases like:
test_expect_code 1 'phoney' '
foo && bar && (exit 1)
'
Here the test might incorrectly succeed if "foo" or "bar" happened to
fail with exit status 1. Instead we now do:
test_expect_success 'phoney' '
foo && bar && test_expect_code 1 "(exit 1)"
'
Which will only succeed if "foo" and "bar" return status 0, and "(exit
1)" returns status 1. Note that test_expect_code has been made slightly
noisier, as it reports the exit code it receives even upon success.
Some test code in t0000-basic.sh relied on the old semantics of
test_expect_code to test the test_when_finished command. I've
converted that code to use an external test similar to the TODO test I
added in v1.7.3-rc0~2^2~3.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Documentation/git-clone: describe --mirror more verbosely
do not depend on signed integer overflow
work around buggy S_ISxxx(m) implementations
xdiff: cast arguments for ctype functions to unsigned char
init: plug tiny one-time memory leak
diffcore-pickaxe.c: remove unnecessary curly braces
t3020 (ls-files-error-unmatch): remove stray '1' from end of file
setup: make sure git dir path is in a permanent buffer
environment.c: remove unused variable
git-svn: fix processing of decorated commit hashes
git-svn: check_cherry_pick should exclude commits already in our history
Documentation/git-svn: discourage "noMetadata"
If the first patch in a series has a To: header in the file and the
second patch in the series doesn't the address from the first patch will
be part of the To: addresses in the second patch. Fix this by treating the
to list like the cc list. Have an initial to list come from the command
line, user input and config options. Then build up a to list from each
patch and concatenate the two together before sending the patch. Finally,
reset the list after sending each patch so the To: headers from a patch
don't get used for the next one.
Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Upon program invocation, MSYS converts environment variables containing
path-like values from Unix-style to DOS-style under the assumption that
the program being invoked understands only DOS-style pathnames. For
instance, the Unix-style path /msysgit is translated to c:/msysgit. For
test t5560, the path being requested from git-http-backend is specified
via environment variable PATH_INFO as a URL path of the form
/repo.git/foobar, which git-http-backend combines with GIT_PROJECT_ROOT
to determine the actual physical path within the repository. This is a
case where MSYS's conversion of the path-like value of PATH_INFO causes
harm, for two reasons. First, the resulting converted path, when joined
with GIT_PROJECT_ROOT is bogus (for instance,
"C:/msysgit/git/t/trash-zzz/C:/msysgit/repo.git/HEAD"). Second, the
converted PATH_INFO path is rejected by git-http-backend as an 'alias'
due to validation failure on the part of daemon_avoid_alias().
Unfortunately, the standard work-around of doubling the leading slash
(i.e. //repo.git/foobar) to suppress MSYS path conversion works only for
command-line arguments, but not for environment variables.
Consequently, side step the problem by instead passing git-http-backend
an already-constructed full path rather than components GIT_PROJECT_ROOT
and PATH_INFO.
Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net>
By default, MSYS sed throws away CR from CRLF line-endings. Tests
t6038.5 and t6038.6 employ sed to normalize conflict output of git-merge
for validation purposes. These tests expect CRLF line-endings to be
present in the normalized output of git-merge, and thus fail when sed
undesirably removes CR. Fix by employing sed's -b/--binary switch to
suppress its default behavior of dropping CR characters.
Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net>
By default, MSYS grep reads in text-mode and converts CRLF into LF line
endings. For testing HTTP use binary mode (-U) as checking is done for
CR in HTTP headers
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net>
These two tests fail on msysGit because /dev/null is an alias for nul on
Windows and when reading the value back from git config the alias does
not match the real filename. Also the HOME environment variable has a
unix-style path but git returns a native equivalent path for '~'. As
these are platform-dependent equivalent results it seems simplest to
skip the test entirely.
Moves the NOT_MINGW prereq from t5503 into the test library.
Signed-off-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net>
* maint:
Fix typo in pack-objects' usage
Make sure that git_getpass() never returns NULL
t0004 (unwritable files): simplify error handling
rev-list-options: clarify --parents and --children
Change `while(<$fh>) { my $c = $_' to `while(my $c = <$fh>) {', and
use `chomp $c' instead of `$c =~ s/\n$//g;', the two are equivalent in
this case.
I've also changed the --cccmd test so that we test for the stripping
of whitespace at the beginning of the lines returned from the
--cccmd. I think we probably shouldn't do this, but it was there
already so I haven't changed the behavior.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.comReviewed-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'test-installed' target in gitweb/Makefile tests installed gitweb,
using the same destination directory that 'install' target uses.
The 'test' target is just a convenience wrapper invoking 'gitweb-test'
target of t/Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
You can set the GITWEB_TEST_INSTALLED environment variable to the
gitwebdir (the directory where gitweb is installed / deployed to) of
an existing gitweb instalation, or to the pathname of installed gitweb
script, to test that installation.
This change is intended to make it possible to test that process of
installing gitweb and the modules it depends on works correctly (after
splitting gitweb).
If GITWEB_TEST_INSTALLED is used, print what script are we testing
to make it easy to spot that we test installed gitweb.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of
... normal test script ...
status=$?
... cleanup ...
(exit $status)
set up cleanup commands with test_when_finished. This makes the
test script a little shorter, and more importantly, it ensures errors
during cleanup are reported.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When there are unmerged entries present, make sure to check for D/F
conflicts first and remove any files present in HEAD that would be in the
way of creating files below the correspondingly named directory. Such
files will be processed again at the end of the merge in
process_df_entry(); at that time we will be able to tell if we need to
and can reinstate the file, whether we need to place its contents in a
different file due to the directory still being present, etc.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If all the paths below some directory involved in a D/F conflict were not
removed during the rest of the merge, then the contents of the file whose
path conflicted needs to be recorded in file with an alternative filename.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If all the paths below some directory involved in a D/F conflict were not
removed during the rest of the merge, then the contents of the file whose
path conflicted needs to be recorded in file with an alternative filename.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This function is called from process_df_entry(), near the end of the merge.
Rather than just checking whether one of the sides of the merge had a
directory at the same path as one of our files, check whether that
directory is still present by this point of our merge.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If all the paths below some directory involved in a D/F conflict were not
removed during the rest of the merge, then the contents of the file whose
path conflicted needs to be recorded in file with an alternative filename.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move the handling of content merging for renames from process_renames() to
process_df_entry().
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move the handling of rename/rename conflicts where one file is renamed to
two different files, from process_renames() to process_df_entry().
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a commit moves A to B while another commit created B (or moved C to
B), and these two different commits serve as different merge-bases for a
later merge, c94736a (merge-recursive: don't segfault while handling
rename clashes 2009-07-30) added some special code to avoid segfaults.
Since that commit, the two versions of B are merged in place (which could
be potentially conflicting) and the intermediate result is used as the
virtual ancestor.
However, right before this special merge, try_merge was turned on, meaning
that process_renames() would try an alternative merge that ignores the
'add' part of the conflict, and, if the merge is clean, store that as the
new virtual ancestor. This could cause incorrect merging of criss-cross
merges; it would typically result in just recording a slightly confusing
merge base, but in some cases it could cause silent acceptance of one side
of a merge as the final resolution when a conflict should have been
flagged.
When we do a special merge for such a rename/add conflict between
merge-bases, turn try_merge off to avoid an inappropriate second merge.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If merging two lines of development involves a rename/add conflict, and two
different people make such a merge but resolve it differently, and then
someone tries to merge the resulting two merges, then they should clearly
get a conflict due to the different resolutions from the previous
developers. However, in some such cases the conflict would not be detected
and git would silently accept one of the two versions being merged as the
final merge resolution.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
c94736a (merge-recursive: don't segfault while handling rename clashes
2009-07-30) added t6036 with a testcase that involved dual renames and a
criss-cross merge. Add a test that is nearly identical, but which also
involves content modification -- a case git currently does not merge
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
c94736a (merge-recursive: don't segfault while handling rename clashes
2009-07-30) added this testcase with an interesting corner case test,
which previously had cased git to segfault. This test ensures that the
segfault does not return and that the merge correctly fails; just add
some checks that verify the state of the index and worktree after the merge
are correct.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add tests where one file is renamed to two different paths in different
sides of history, and where each of the new files matches the name of a
directory from the opposite side of history. Include tests for both the
case where the merge results in those directories not being cleanly
removed, and where those directories are cleanly removed during the merge.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An interesting testcase is having two files each in their own subdirectory
getting renamed to the toplevel at the directory pathname of the other.
Questions arise as to whether the order of operations matters and whether
the directories can correctly get out of the way and make room for the
new files.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Having the source of a rename be involved in a directory/file conflict does
not currently pose any difficulties to the current merge-recursive
algorithm (in contrast to destinations of renames and D/F conflicts).
However, combining the two seemed like good testcases to include for
completeness.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When merging two branches with some path involved in a D/F conflict, the
choice of which branch to merge into the other matters for (at least) two
reasons: (1) whether the working copy has a directory full of files that
is in the way of a file, or a file exists that is in the way of a
directory of files, (2) when the directory full of files does not disappear
due to the merge, what files at the same paths should be renamed to
(e.g. filename~HEAD vs. filename~otherbranch).
Add some tests that reverse the merge order of two other tests, and which
verify the contents are as expected (namely, that the results are identical
other than modified-for-uniqueness filenames involving branch names).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add testing of the various ways that a renamed file to a path involved in
a directory/file conflict may be involved in. This includes whether or not
there are conflicts of the contents of the renamed file (if the file was
modified on both sides of history), and whether the directory from the
other side of the merge will disappear as a result of the merge or not.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
