When compacting tables, it may happen that we want to compact a set of tables which are already locked by a concurrent process that compacts them. In the case where we wanted to perform a full compaction of all tables it is sensible to bail out in this case, as we cannot fulfill the requested action. But when performing auto-compaction it isn't necessarily in our best interest of us to abort the whole operation. For example, due to the geometric compacting schema that we use, it may be that process A takes a lot of time to compact the bulk of all tables whereas process B appends a bunch of new tables to the stack. B would in this case also notice that it has to compact the tables that process A is compacting already and thus also try to compact the same range, probably including the new tables it has appended. But because those tables are locked already, it will fail and thus abort the complete auto-compaction. The consequence is that the stack will grow longer and longer while A isn't yet done with compaction, which will lead to a growing performance impact. Instead of aborting auto-compaction altogether, let's gracefully handle this situation by instead compacting tables which aren't locked. To do so, instead of locking from the beginning of the slice-to-be-compacted, we start locking tables from the end of the slice. Once we hit the first table that is locked already, we abort. If we succeeded to lock two or more tables, then we simply reduce the slice of tables that we're about to compact to those which we managed to lock. This ensures that we can at least make some progress for compaction in said scenario. It also helps in other scenarios, like for example when a process died and left a stale lockfile behind. In such a case we can at least ensure some compaction on a best-effort basis. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see
Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and
Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command.
If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be
read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the
documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt
(man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is
installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).
Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message
string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md
(a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).
To subscribe to the list, send an email to git+subscribe@vger.kernel.org (see https://subspace.kernel.org/subscribing.html for details). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, https://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.
The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):
- random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
- stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
- "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
- "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks