Jeff King d6045294a9 lookup_commit_in_graph(): use prepare_commit_graph() to check for graph
We exit early from lookup_commit_in_graph() if the commit_graph pointer
is NULL, under the assumption that we don't have a graph to look at. But
the graph pointer is lazy-loaded; if no other code happens to have
called prepare_commit_graph(), we'll incorrectly assume that one isn't
available at all.

This has a pretty small performance impact in practice, because the
fallback will generally be to call parse_object() instead. That ends up
in parse_commit_buffer(), which loads the graph data itself. So the
first commit we see won't use the graph, but subsequent ones will. Since
using the graph is just an optimization there's generally no
user-visible difference, but if you instrument rev-list like so:

  diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
  index ee702e498a..63c488ffb6 100644
  --- a/revision.c
  +++ b/revision.c
  @@ -381,6 +381,9 @@ static struct object *get_reference(struct rev_info *revs, const char *name,
           * parsing commit data from disk.
           */
          commit = lookup_commit_in_graph(revs->repo, oid);
  +       warning("%s %s in commit graph",
  +               commit ? "found" : "did not find",
  +               name);
          if (commit)
                  object = &commit->object;
          else

and run (in git.git):

  git commit-graph write --reachable
  git rev-list origin/master origin/next >/dev/null

you'll see that we fail to find the first one:

  warning: did not find origin/master in commit graph
  warning: found origin/next in commit graph

After this patch, you'll see that we find both:

  warning: found origin/master in commit graph
  warning: found origin/next in commit graph

Even though the performance implication is small here, there are two
important reasons to do this:

  - it's downright confusing if you are hunting a bug triggered by the
    use of the commit graph. It may or may not trigger depending on the
    number and ordering of tips you ask for.

  - prepare_commit_graph() has other policy logic, too. In particular,
    if we've loaded a commit graph and then disabled the graph via
    disable_commit_graph(), that should take precedence.

    I'm not sure if this can trigger bad behavior in practice. The only
    caller there is upload-pack's deepen_by_rev_list(), which should be
    avoiding the commit graph for its traversal tips, but probably
    wasn't before this patch. Whether you could come up with a case
    where that mattered is unclear. Still, this is obviously the right
    thing to be doing.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-09-07 09:44:28 -07:00
2022-08-30 10:22:10 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2022-03-29 12:22:02 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00
2022-06-03 14:30:37 -07:00
2020-08-10 10:23:57 -07:00
2022-01-07 15:19:34 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2022-06-03 14:30:34 -07:00
2022-05-10 17:41:10 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00
2022-07-19 12:45:31 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2022-04-20 16:17:35 -07:00
2022-06-03 14:30:34 -07:00
2022-03-28 10:25:52 -07:00
2021-09-23 13:44:48 -07:00
2022-08-30 10:22:10 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2022-05-16 15:02:09 -07:00
2022-04-06 15:21:59 -07:00
2022-05-02 09:50:37 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2022-05-02 09:50:37 -07:00
2022-01-27 12:07:53 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00
2022-06-03 14:30:37 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2022-06-03 14:30:34 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00
2021-08-24 15:32:37 -07:00
2020-10-27 15:09:50 -07:00
2022-04-04 10:56:23 -07:00
2021-10-25 16:06:58 -07:00
2022-04-06 09:42:12 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00
2022-04-20 16:17:33 -07:00
2022-04-20 16:17:33 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00
2022-07-19 12:45:31 -07:00
2022-03-23 14:09:29 -07:00
2021-05-04 11:52:02 +09:00
2021-05-04 11:52:02 +09:00
2022-05-02 09:50:37 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00

Build status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).

Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md (a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).

To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org (not the Git list). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 582 MiB
Languages
C 50.5%
Shell 38.7%
Perl 4.5%
Tcl 3.2%
Python 0.8%
Other 2.1%