mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2026-01-21 22:37:17 +09:00
The __gitdir() helper function finds out the path of the git repository by running 'git rev-parse --git-dir'. However, it has a shortcut first to avoid the overhead of running a git command in a subshell when the current directory is at the top of the work tree, i.e. when it contains a '.git' subdirectory. If the 'GIT_DIR' environment variable is set then it specifies the path to the git repository, and the autodetection of the '.git' directory is not necessary. However, $GIT_DIR is only taken into acocunt by 'git rev-parse --git-dir', and the check for the '.git' subdirectory is performed first, so it wins over the path given in $GIT_DIR. There are several completion (helper) functions that depend on __gitdir(), and when the above case triggers the completion script will do weird things, like offering refs, aliases, or stashes from a different repository, or displaying wrong or broken prompt, etc. So check first whether $GIT_DIR is set, and only proceed with checking the '.git' directory in the current directory if it isn't. 'git rev-parse' would also check whether the path in $GIT_DIR is a proper '.git' directory, i.e. 'HEAD', 'refs/', and 'objects/' are present and accessible, but we don't have to be that thorough for the bash prompt. And we've lived with an equally permissive check for '.git' in the current working directory for years anyway. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Contributed Software Although these pieces are available as part of the official git source tree, they are in somewhat different status. The intention is to keep interesting tools around git here, maybe even experimental ones, to give users an easier access to them, and to give tools wider exposure, so that they can be improved faster. I am not expecting to touch these myself that much. As far as my day-to-day operation is concerned, these subdirectories are owned by their respective primary authors. I am willing to help if users of these components and the contrib/ subtree "owners" have technical/design issues to resolve, but the initiative to fix and/or enhance things _must_ be on the side of the subtree owners. IOW, I won't be actively looking for bugs and rooms for enhancements in them as the git maintainer -- I may only do so just as one of the users when I want to scratch my own itch. If you have patches to things in contrib/ area, the patch should be first sent to the primary author, and then the primary author should ack and forward it to me (git pull request is nicer). This is the same way as how I have been treating gitk, and to a lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the drill. I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory. On the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused and inactive ones from time to time. If you have new things to add to this area, please first propose it on the git mailing list, and after a list discussion proves there are some general interests (it does not have to be a list-wide consensus for a tool targeted to a relatively narrow audience -- for example I do not work with projects whose upstream is svn, so I have no use for git-svn myself, but it is of general interest for people who need to interoperate with SVN repositories in a way git-svn works better than git-svnimport), submit a patch to create a subdirectory of contrib/ and put your stuff there. -jc