Elijah Newren 034b2fde7f t6423: document two bugs with rename-to-self testcases
When commit 98a1a00d5301 (t6423: add a testcase causing a failed
assertion in process_renames, 2025-03-06) was added, I tweaked
the commit message, and moved the test into t6423.  However, that
still left two other things missing that made this test unlike the
others in the same testfile:

  * It didn't have an English description of the test setup like
    all other tests in t6423

  * It didn't check that the right number of files were present at
    the end

The former issue is a minor detail that isn't that critical, but the
latter feels more important.  If it had been done, I might have noticed
another bug.  In particular, this testcase involves
   Side A: rename world -> tools/world
and
   Side B: rename tools/ -> <the toplevel>
   Side B: remove world
The tools/ -> <toplevel> rename turns the world -> tools/world rename
into world -> world, i.e. a rename-to-self case.  But, it's a path
conflict because merge.directoryRenames defaults to false.  There's
no content conflict because Side A didn't modify world, so we should
just take the content of world from Side B -- i.e. delete it.  So, we
have a conflict on the path, but not on its content.  We could consider
letting the content trump since it is unconflicted, but if we are going
to leave a conflict, it should certainly represent that 'world' existed
both in the base version and on Side A.  Currently it doesn't.

Add a description of this test, add some checking of the number of
entries in the index at the end of the merge, and mark the test as
expecting to fail for now.  A subsequent commit will fix this bug.

While at it, I found another related bug from a nearly identical setup
but setting merge.directoryRenames=true.  Copy testcase 12n into 12n2,
changing it to use merge instead of cherry-pick, and turn on directory
renames for this test.  In this case, since there is no content conflict
and no path conflict, it should be okay to delete the file.
Unfortunately, the code resolves without conflict but silently leaves
world despite the fact it should be deleted.  It might also be okay if
the code spuriously thought there was a modify/delete conflict here;
that would at least notify users to look closer and then when they
notice there was no change since the base version, they can easily
resolve.  A conflict notice is much better than silently providing the
wrong resolution.  Cover this with the 12n2 testcase, which for now is
marked as expecting to fail as well.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2025-08-07 13:23:58 -07:00
2025-06-03 08:55:24 -07:00
2025-05-27 13:59:09 -07:00
2023-11-26 10:07:06 +09:00
2025-05-15 13:46:47 -07:00
2024-09-20 14:40:41 -07:00
2024-09-06 09:31:15 -07:00
2024-12-18 10:44:30 -08:00
2024-09-23 10:35:07 -07:00
2025-03-26 16:26:09 +09:00
2025-05-27 13:59:11 -07:00
2025-04-24 17:25:33 -07:00
2024-09-16 10:46:00 -07:00
2024-06-14 10:26:33 -07:00
2024-06-14 10:26:33 -07:00
2024-01-23 10:40:10 -08:00
2025-05-27 13:59:11 -07:00
2025-04-24 17:25:33 -07:00
2025-03-05 10:37:44 -08:00
2024-06-14 10:26:33 -07:00
2025-01-21 08:44:54 -08:00
2025-01-21 08:44:54 -08:00
2024-12-23 09:32:11 -08:00
2024-04-05 15:21:14 -07:00
2024-12-18 10:44:31 -08:00
2025-03-03 13:49:23 -08:00
2025-05-05 14:56:24 -07:00
2024-10-23 16:16:36 -04:00
2024-10-23 16:16:36 -04:00
2024-10-23 16:16:36 -04:00
2024-09-19 13:46:00 -07:00
2025-06-15 21:17:21 -07:00
2025-03-03 08:17:47 -08:00
2024-12-18 10:44:31 -08:00
2023-11-26 10:07:05 +09:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2025-05-08 12:36:31 -07:00
2025-05-15 13:46:47 -07:00
2025-06-06 08:12:24 -07:00
2025-01-31 10:06:10 -08:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2024-10-23 16:16:36 -04:00
2023-11-26 10:07:05 +09:00
2023-11-26 10:07:05 +09:00
2024-06-14 10:26:33 -07:00
2024-12-18 10:44:31 -08:00
2025-05-22 14:48:37 -07:00
2024-02-26 15:34:01 -08:00
2024-07-08 14:53:10 -07:00
2025-04-24 17:25:33 -07:00
2025-04-23 13:58:50 -07:00
2025-05-12 13:06:26 -07:00
2024-10-21 16:05:04 -04:00
2024-06-14 10:26:33 -07:00
2024-12-18 10:44:30 -08:00
2024-12-18 10:44:30 -08:00
2025-02-03 16:12:42 -08:00
2025-02-03 16:12:42 -08:00
2024-12-18 10:44:30 -08:00
2024-12-18 10:44:30 -08:00
2023-11-26 10:07:05 +09:00
2025-03-03 13:49:19 -08:00
2024-09-19 13:46:01 -07:00
2024-04-05 15:21:14 -07:00
2025-03-26 16:26:11 +09:00
2024-06-14 10:26:33 -07:00
2024-09-19 13:46:12 -07:00
2024-12-18 10:44:30 -08:00
2023-11-26 10:07:05 +09:00
2024-12-27 08:12:40 -08:00
2024-09-30 11:23:03 -07:00
2024-06-14 10:26:33 -07:00
2023-09-15 17:08:46 -07:00
2025-01-13 12:55:26 -08:00
2025-01-13 12:55:26 -08:00
2024-12-23 09:32:11 -08:00
2024-05-17 10:33:39 -07:00
2025-03-03 13:49:26 -08:00
2024-12-18 10:44:30 -08:00
2024-12-18 10:44:30 -08:00
2025-05-15 13:46:47 -07:00
2025-03-03 13:49:27 -08:00
2025-02-06 14:56:45 -08:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2025-01-17 13:30:02 -08:00
2025-05-15 17:24:55 -07:00
2024-06-14 10:26:33 -07:00

Build status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.adoc to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.adoc for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.adoc for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.adoc (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).

Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md (a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).

To subscribe to the list, send an email to git+subscribe@vger.kernel.org (see https://subspace.kernel.org/subscribing.html for details). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, https://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 582 MiB
Languages
C 50.5%
Shell 38.7%
Perl 4.5%
Tcl 3.2%
Python 0.8%
Other 2.1%