Dip our toes a bit to (optionally) use Rust implemented helper
called from our C code.
* ps/rust-balloon:
ci: enable Rust for breaking-changes jobs
ci: convert "pedantic" job into full build with breaking changes
BreakingChanges: announce Rust becoming mandatory
varint: reimplement as test balloon for Rust
varint: use explicit width for integers
help: report on whether or not Rust is enabled
Makefile: introduce infrastructure to build internal Rust library
Makefile: reorder sources after includes
meson: add infrastructure to build internal Rust library
The "do you still use it?" message given by a command that is
deeply deprecated and allow us to suggest alternatives has been
updated.
* kh/you-still-use-whatchanged-fix:
BreakingChanges: remove claim about whatchanged reports
whatchanged: remove not-even-shorter clause
whatchanged: hint about git-log(1) and aliasing
you-still-use-that??: help the user help themselves
t0014: test shadowing of aliases for a sample of builtins
git: allow alias-shadowing deprecated builtins
git: move seen-alias bookkeeping into handle_alias(...)
git: add `deprecated` category to --list-cmds
Makefile: don’t add whatchanged after it has been removed
Over the last couple of years the appetite for bringing Rust into the
codebase has grown significantly across the developer base. Introducing
Rust is a major change though and has ramifications for the whole
ecosystem:
- Some platforms have a Rust toolchain available, but have not yet
integrated it into their build infrastructure.
- Some platforms don't have any support for Rust at all.
- Some platforms may have to figure out how to fit Rust into their
bootstrapping sequence.
Due to this, and given that Git is a critical piece of infrastructure
for the whole industry, we cannot just introduce such a heavyweight
dependency without doing our due diligence.
Instead, preceding commits have introduced a test balloon into our build
infrastructure that convert one tiny subsystem to use Rust. For now,
using Rust to build that subsystem is entirely optional -- if no Rust
support is available, we continue to use the C implementation. This test
balloon has the intention to give distributions time and let them ease
into our adoption of Rust.
Having multiple implementations of the same subsystem is not sustainable
though, and the plan is to eventually be able to use Rust freely all
across our codebase. As such, there is the intent to make Rust become a
mandatory part of our build process.
Add an announcement to our breaking changes that Rust will become
mandatory in Git 3.0. A (very careful and non-binding) estimate might be
that this major release might be released in the second half of next
year, which should give distributors enough time to prepare for the
change.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Declare that "git init" that is not otherwise configured uses
'main' as the initial branch, not 'master', starting Git 3.0.
* pw/3.0-default-initial-branch-to-main:
t0613: stop setting default initial branch
t9902: switch default branch name to main
t4013: switch default branch name to main
breaking-changes: switch default branch to main
This was written in e836757e14b (whatschanged: list it in
BreakingChanges document, 2025-05-12) which was on the same
topic that added the `--i-still-use-this` requirement.[1]
Maybe it was a work-in-progress comment/status.
[1]: jc/you-still-use-whatchanged
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 1296cbe4b46 (init: document `init.defaultBranch` better,
2020-12-11) "git-init.adoc" has advertised that the default name
of the initial branch may change in the future. The name "main"
is chosen to match the default used by the big Git forge web sites.
The advice printed when init.defaultBranch is not set is updated
to say that the default will change to "main" in Git 3.0. Building
with WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES enabled removes the advice and changes
the default branch name to "main". The code in guess_remote_head()
that looks for "refs/heads/master" is left unchanged as that is only
called when the remote server does not support the symref capability
in the v0 protocol or the symref extension to the ls-refs list in the
v2 protocol. Such an old server is more likely to be using "master"
as the default branch name.
With the exception of the "git-init.adoc" the documentation is left
unchanged. I had hoped to parameterize the name of the default branch
by using an asciidoc attribute. Unfortunately attribute expansion
is inhibited by backticks and we use backticks to mark up ref names
so that idea does not work. As the changes to git-init.adoc show
inserting ifdef's around each instance of the branch name "master"
is cumbersome and makes the documentation sources harder to read.
Apart from "git-init.adoc" there are some other files where "master" is
used as the name of the initial branch rather than as an example of a
branch name such as "user-manual.adoc" and "gitcore-tutorial.adoc". The
name appears a lot in those so updating it with ifdef's is not really
practical. We can update that document in the 3.0 release cycle. The
other documentation where master is used as an example branch name
can be gradually converted over time.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "core.commentString" is set to "auto" then "git commit" will
automatically select the comment character ensuring that it is not the
first character on any of the lines in the commit message. This was
introduced by commit 84c9dc2c5a2 (commit: allow core.commentChar=auto
for character auto selection, 2014-05-17). The motivation seems to be
to avoid commenting out lines from the existing message when amending
a commit that was created with a message from a file.
Unfortunately this feature does not work with:
* commit message templates that contain comments.
* prepare-commit-msg hooks that introduce comments.
* "git commit --cleanup=strip --edit -F <file>" which means that it
is incompatible with
- the "fixup" and "squash" commands of "git rebase -i" as the
comments added by those commands are then treated as part of
the commit message.
- the conflict comments added to the commit message by "git
cherry-pick", "git rebase" etc. as these comments are then
treated as part of the commit message.
It is also ignored by "git notes" when amending a note.
The issues with comments coming from a template, hook or file are a
consequence of the design of this feature and are therefore hard to
fix.
As the costs of this feature outweigh the benefits, deprecate it and
remove it in Git 3.0. If someone comes up with some patches that fix
all the issues in a maintainable way then I'd be happy to see this
change reverted.
The next commits will add a warning and some advice for users on how
they can update their config settings.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "reftable" format has come a long way and has matured nicely since
it has been merged into git via 57db2a094d5 (refs: introduce reftable
backend, 2024-02-07). It fixes longstanding issues that cannot be fixed
with the "files" format in a backwards-compatible way and performs
significantly better in many use cases.
Announce that we will switch to the "reftable" format in Git 3.0 for
newly created repositories and wire up the change, hidden behind the
WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES preprocessor define.
This switch is dependent on support in the larger Git ecosystem. Most
importantly, libraries like JGit, libgit2 and Gitoxide should support
the reftable backend so that we don't break all applications and tools
built on top of those libraries.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git whatchanged" that is longer to type than "git log --raw"
which is its modern rough equivalent has outlived its usefulness
more than 10 years ago. Plan to deprecate and remove it.
* jc/you-still-use-whatchanged:
whatschanged: list it in BreakingChanges document
whatchanged: remove when built with WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES
whatchanged: require --i-still-use-this
tests: prepare for a world without whatchanged
doc: prepare for a world without whatchanged
you-still-use-that??: help deprecating commands for removal
This can be squashed into the previous step. That is how our "git
pack-redundant" conversion did.
Theoretically, however, those who want to gauge the need to keep the
command by exposing their users to patches before this one may want
to wait until their experiment finishes before they formally say
"this will go away".
This change is made into a separate patch from the previous step
precisely to help those folks.
While at it, update the documentation page to use the new [synopsis]
facility to mark-up the SYNOPSIS part.
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
[en: typofix]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As part of Git 3.0, remove the hidden synonym for "--annotate-stdin"
for real. As this does not change the fact that it used to be
called "--stdin" in older version of Git, keep that passage in the
documentation for "--annotate-stdin".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Removal of ".git/branches" and ".git/remotes" support in the
BreakingChanges document has been further clarified.
* jc/3.0-branches-remotes-update:
BreakingChanges: clarify branches/ and remotes/
All the documentation .txt files have been renamed to .adoc to help
content aware editors.
* bc/doc-adoc-not-txt:
Remove obsolete ".txt" extensions for AsciiDoc files
doc: use .adoc extension for AsciiDoc files
gitattributes: mark AsciiDoc files as LF-only
editorconfig: add .adoc extension
doc: update gitignore for .adoc extension
We presently use the ".txt" extension for our AsciiDoc files. While not
wrong, most editors do not associate this extension with AsciiDoc,
meaning that contributors don't get automatic editor functionality that
could be useful, such as syntax highlighting and prose linting.
It is much more common to use the ".adoc" extension for AsciiDoc files,
since this helps editors automatically detect files and also allows
various forges to provide rich (HTML-like) rendering. Let's do that
here, renaming all of the files and updating the includes where
relevant. Adjust the various build scripts and makefiles to use the new
extension as well.
Note that this should not result in any user-visible changes to the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
