"git push" had a code path that led to BUG() but it should have
been a die(), as it is a response to a usual but invalid end-user
action to attempt pushing an object that does not exist.
* dl/push-missing-object-error:
remote.c: convert if-else ladder to switch
remote.c: remove BUG in show_push_unqualified_ref_name_error()
t5516: remove surrounding empty lines in test bodies
Arrays of strbuf is often a wrong data structure to use, and
strbuf_split*() family of functions that create them often have
better alternatives.
Update several code paths and replace strbuf_split*().
* jc/strbuf-split:
trace2: do not use strbuf_split*()
trace2: trim_trailing_newline followed by trim is a no-op
sub-process: do not use strbuf_split*()
environment: do not use strbuf_split*()
config: do not use strbuf_split()
notes: do not use strbuf_split*()
merge-tree: do not use strbuf_split*()
clean: do not use strbuf_split*() [part 2]
clean: do not pass the whole structure when it is not necessary
clean: do not use strbuf_split*() [part 1]
clean: do not pass strbuf by value
wt-status: avoid strbuf_split*()
string_list_split*() family of functions have been extended to
simplify common use cases.
* jc/string-list-split:
string-list: split-then-remove-empty can be done while splitting
string-list: optionally omit empty string pieces in string_list_split*()
diff: simplify parsing of diff.colormovedws
string-list: optionally trim string pieces split by string_list_split*()
string-list: unify string_list_split* functions
string-list: align string_list_split() with its _in_place() counterpart
string-list: report programming error with BUG
"git describe" has been optimized by using better data structure.
* rs/describe-with-prio-queue:
describe: use prio_queue_replace()
describe: use prio_queue
"git remote rename origin upstream" failed to move origin/HEAD to
upstream/HEAD when origin/HEAD is unborn and performed other
renames extremely inefficiently, which has been corrected.
* ps/remote-rename-fix:
builtin/remote: only iterate through refs that are to be renamed
builtin/remote: rework how remote refs get renamed
builtin/remote: determine whether refs need renaming early on
builtin/remote: fix sign comparison warnings
refs: simplify logic when migrating reflog entries
refs: pass refname when invoking reflog entry callback
"git refs migrate" to migrate the reflog entries from a refs
backend to another had a handful of bugs squashed.
* ps/reflog-migrate-fixes:
refs: fix invalid old object IDs when migrating reflogs
refs: stop unsetting REF_HAVE_OLD for log-only updates
refs/files: detect race when generating reflog entry for HEAD
refs: fix identity for migrated reflogs
ident: fix type of string length parameter
builtin/reflog: implement subcommand to write new entries
refs: export `ref_transaction_update_reflog()`
builtin/reflog: improve grouping of subcommands
Documentation/git-reflog: convert to use synopsis type
During interactive rebase, using 'drop' on a merge commit lead to
an error, which was incorrect.
* js/rebase-i-allow-drop-on-a-merge:
rebase -i: permit 'drop' of a merge commit
git-gui invokes some long running commands using "nice git $cmd" if nice
is found and works, otherwise just "git $cmd". The current code is more
complex than needed; let's simplify it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
git-gui since 8fe7861c51 ("git-gui: assure PATH has only absolute
elements.", 2025-04-11) uses a list to maintain order and a dict to
detect duplicated elements without quadratic complexity. But, Tcl's
dict explicitly maintains keys in the order first added, thus the list
is not needed. Simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
When 399b1984 (config: include file if remote URL matches a glob,
2022-01-18) added the 'hasconfig:remote.*.url:<URL>' condition to be
used in the "includeIf.<condition>.path" configuration, the keyword
was added with an extra colon in the documentation.
The section that documents these condition begins with this preamble:
The condition starts with a keyword followed by a colon and some data
whose format and meaning depends on the keyword. Supported keywords
are:
which makes it clear that the colon that comes between the condition
keyword (e.g. "gitdir") and the parameter (aka "some data") is not
a part of the keyword.
Lose the extra colon. Also rewrite description of all keywords to
clarify that "some data" does not directly follow "keyword", and the
colon is not a part of keyword.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* lo/repo-info:
repo: add the --format flag
repo: add the field layout.shallow
repo: add the field layout.bare
repo: add the field references.format
repo: declare the repo command
Asciidoc.py and Asciidoctor do not process the '+' verbatim the same way. A
span is detected when the format sign (here '+')is preceded by a non-word
character. It seems that '{nbsp}' is considered a non-word sign by
Asciidoc.py, but not by Asciidoctor.
Using a double format-sign opens 'unconstrained' span, independent on the
preceding character in both engines.
The '+' sign is used instead of the backtick '`' because it is not processed
as synopsis in asciidoc.py. Unfortunately, the post-processing of verbatim
synopsis in asciidoctor cannot be bypassed and formatting of the parentheses
is forced in syntax sign instead of keywords, unless a proper grammar
analyzer is used.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When line-level log is invoked with more than one disjoint line range
in the same file, and one of the commits happens to change that file
such that one diff range modifies more than one line range, then
changes to all modified line ranges should be shown, but only the
changes in the first modified line range are:
$ git log --oneline -p
80ca903 (HEAD -> master) Initial
diff --git a/file b/file
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..00935f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/file
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+Line 1
+Line 2
+Line 3
+Line 4
+Line 5
+Line 6
+Line 7
+Line 8
+Line 9
+Line 10
$ git log --oneline -L1,2:file -L4,5:file -L7,8:file
80ca903 (HEAD -> master) Initial
diff --git a/file b/file
--- /dev/null
+++ b/file
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Line 1
+Line 2
The line-log-specific diff printer is already clever enough to handle
the case when one line range covers multiple diff ranges, but the
possibility of one diff range touching multiple disjoint line ranges
was apparently overlooked.
Add the necessary condition to dump_diff_hacky_one() to handle this case
as well, and show all modified line ranges:
$ git log --oneline -L1,2:file -L4,5:file -L7,8:file
0f9a5b4 (HEAD -> master) Initial
diff --git a/file b/file
--- /dev/null
+++ b/file
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Line 1
+Line 2
@@ -0,0 +4,2 @@
+Line 4
+Line 5
@@ -0,0 +7,2 @@
+Line 7
+Line 8
This bug was already present in the initial line-log implementation
added in 2da1d1f6f (Implement line-history search (git log -L),
2013-03-28). Interestingly, that commit already contained a canned
test case covering a similar scenario:
"-L '/long f/',/^}/:a.c -L /main/,/^}/:a.c simple"
This test case looks for two line ranges in the same file, and both
trace back disjointly to the test repository's inital commit,
therefore changes to both line ranges should have been shown for the
initial commit, but only changes for the first line range are shown.
So this test case should have failed from the very beginning, but it
never did, because, unfortunately, the canned expected result is
incorrect, as it doesn't include changes for the second line range.
A similar test with a similarly incorrect canned expected result was
added later in 209618860c (log -L: fix overlapping input ranges,
2013-04-05).
Correct these two canned expected results to contain the changes for
the second line range for the initial commit as well.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When line-level log is invoked with more than one disjoint line range
in the same file, and one of the commits happens to change that file
such that:
- the last line of a line range R(n) immediately preceeds the first line
modified or added by a hunk H, and
- subtracting the number of lines added by hunk H from the start and
end of the subsequent line range R(n+1) would result in a range
overlapping with line range R(n),
then git aborts with an assertion error, because those overlapping
line ranges violate the invariants:
$ git log --oneline -p
73e4e2f (HEAD -> master) Add lines 6 7 8 9 10
diff --git a/file b/file
index 572d5d9..00935f1 100644
--- a/file
+++ b/file
@@ -3,3 +3,8 @@ Line 2
Line 3
Line 4
Line 5
+Line 6
+Line 7
+Line 8
+Line 9
+Line 10
66e3561 Add lines 1 2 3 4 5
diff --git a/file b/file
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..572d5d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/file
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+Line 1
+Line 2
+Line 3
+Line 4
+Line 5
$ git log --oneline -L3,5:file -L7,8:file
git: line-log.c:73: range_set_append: Assertion `rs->nr == 0 || rs->ranges[rs->nr-1].end <= a' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
The line-log machinery encodes line and diff ranges internally as
[start, end) pairs, i.e. include 'start' but exclude 'end', and line
numbering starts at 0 (as opposed to the -LX,Y option, where it starts
at 1, IOW the parameter -L3,5 is represented internally as { start =
2, end = 5 }).
The reason for this assertion error and some related issues is that
there are a couple of places where 'end' is mistakenly considered to
be part of the range:
- When a commit modifies an interesting path, the line-log machinery
first checks which diff range (i.e. hunk) modify any line ranges.
This is done in diff_ranges_filter_touched(), where the outer loop
iterates over the diff ranges, and in each iteration the inner
loop advances the line ranges supposedly until the current line
range ends at or after the current diff range starts, and then the
current diff and line ranges are checked for overlap.
For HEAD in the above example the first line range [2, 5) ends
just before the diff range [5, 10) starts, so the inner loop
should advance, and then the second line range [6, 8) and the diff
range should be checked for overlap.
Unfortunately, the condition of the inner loop mistakenly
considers 'end' as part of the line range, and, seeing the diff
range starting at 5 and the line range ending at 5, it doesn't
skip the first range. Consequently, the diff range and the first
line range are checked for overlap, and after that the outer loop
runs out of diff ranges, and then the processing goes on in the
false belief that this commit didn't touch any of the interesting
line ranges.
The line-log machinery later shifts the line ranges to account for
any added/removed lines in the diff ranges preceeding each line
range. This leaves the first line range intact, but attempts to
shift the second line range [6, 8) by 5 lines towards the
beginning of the file, resulting in [1, 3), triggering the
assertion error, because the two overlapping line ranges violate
the invariants.
Fix that loop condition in diff_ranges_filter_touched() to not
treat 'end' as part of the line range.
- With the above fix the assertion error is gone... but, alas, we
now get stuck in an endless loop!
This happens in range_set_difference(), where a couple of nested
loops iterate over the line and diff ranges, and a condition is
supposed to break the middle loop when the current line range ends
before the current diff range, so processing could continue with
the next line range.
For HEAD in the above example the first line range [2, 5) ends
just before the diff range [5, 10) starts, so this condition
should trigger and break the middle loop.
Unfortunately, just like in the case of the assertion error, this
conditions mistakenly considers 'end' as part of the line range,
and, seeing the line range ending at 5 and the diff range starting
at 5, it doesn't break the loop, which will then go on and on.
Fix this condition in range_set_difference() to not treat 'end' as
part of the line range.
- With the above fix the endless loop is gone... but, alas, the
output is now wrong, as it shows both line ranges for HEAD, even
though the first line range is not modified by that commit:
$ git log --oneline -L3,5:file -L7,8:file
73e4e2f (HEAD -> master) Add lines 6 7 8 9 10
diff --git a/file b/file
--- a/file
+++ b/file
@@ -3,3 +3,3 @@
Line 3
Line 4
Line 5
@@ -6,0 +7,2 @@
+Line 7
+Line 8
66e3561 Add lines 1 2 3 4 5
diff --git a/file b/file
--- /dev/null
+++ b/file
@@ -0,0 +3,3 @@
+Line 3
+Line 4
+Line 5
In dump_diff_hacky_one() a couple of nested loops are responsible
for finding and printing the modified line ranges: the big outer
loop iterates over all line ranges, and the first inner loop skips
over the diff ranges that end before the start of the current line
range. This is followed by a condition checking whether the
current diff range starts after the end of the current line range,
which, when fulfilled, continues and advances the outer loop to
the next line range.
For HEAD in the above example the first line range [2, 5) ends
just before the diff range [5, 10), so this condition should
trigger, and the outer loop should advance to the second line
range.
Unfortunately, just like in the previous cases, this condition
mistakenly considers 'end' as part of the line range, and, seeing
the first line range ending at 5 and the diff range starting at 5,
it doesn't continue to advance the outher loop, but goes on to
show the (unmodified) first line range.
Fix this condition to not treat 'end' as part of the line range,
just like in the previous cases.
After all this the command in the above example finally finishes and
produces the right output:
$ git log --oneline -L3,5:file -L7,8:file
73e4e2f (HEAD -> master) Add lines 6 7 8 9 10
diff --git a/file b/file
--- a/file
+++ b/file
@@ -6,0 +7,2 @@
+Line 7
+Line 8
66e3561 Add lines 1 2 3 4 5
diff --git a/file b/file
--- /dev/null
+++ b/file
@@ -0,0 +3,3 @@
+Line 3
+Line 4
+Line 5
Add a canned test similar to the above example, with the line ranges
adjusted to the test repository's history.
Reported-by: Evgeni Chasnovski <evgeni.chasnovski@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Discord is a great way of receiving help for members of the community
that are not on the mailing list or not familiar with Libera.
Adding it to the official documentation will aid discoverability of it.
The link is the same as the one at https://git-scm.com/community.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Sassoli <danielesassoli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's a call in describe_commit() to lookup_commit_reference(), but we
don't check the return value. If it returns NULL, we'll segfault as we
immediately dereference the result.
In practice this can never happen, since all callers pass an oid which
came from a "struct commit" already. So we can make this more obvious
by just taking that commit struct in the first place.
Reported-by: Cheng <prophecheng@stu.pku.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When describing a blob, we traverse from HEAD, remembering each commit
we saw, and then checking each blob to report the containing commit.
But if we haven't seen any commits at all, we'll segfault (we store the
"current" commit as an oid initialized to the null oid, causing
lookup_commit_reference() to return NULL).
This shouldn't be able to happen normally. We always start our traversal
at HEAD, which must be a commit (a property which is enforced by the
refs code). But you can trigger the segfault like this:
blob=$(echo foo | git hash-object -w --stdin)
echo $blob >.git/HEAD
git describe $blob
We can instead catch this case and return an empty result, which hits
the usual "we didn't find $blob while traversing HEAD" error.
This is a minor lie in that we did "find" the blob. And this even hints
at a bigger problem in this code: what if the traversal pointed to the
blob as _not_ part of a commit at all, but we had previously filled in
the recorded "current commit"? One could imagine this happening due to a
tag pointing directly to the blob in question.
But that can't happen, because we only traverse from HEAD, never from
any other refs. And the intent of the blob-describing code is to find
blobs within commits.
So I think this matches the original intent as closely as we can (and
again, this segfault cannot be triggered without corrupting your
repository!).
The test here does not use the formula above, which works only for the
files backend (and not reftables). Instead we use another loophole to
create the bogus state using only Git commands. See the comment in the
test for details.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gitk is now maintained by Johannes Sixt and the repository can be
cloned from a new URL. b59358100c20 (Update the official repo of
gitk, 2024-12-24) could have updated this instance in the manual,
too, but the opportunity was missed. Update it now. Do give credit
to Paul Mackerras as the inventor of the program.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When given an expected "before" state, the ref-writing code will avoid
overwriting any ref that does not match that expected state. We use the
null oid as a sentinel value for "nothing should exist", and likewise
that is the sentinel value we get when trying to read a ref that does
not exist.
But there's one corner case where this is ambiguous: dangling symrefs.
Trying to read them will yield the null oid, but there is potentially
something of value there: the dangling symref itself.
For a normal recursive write, this is OK. Imagine we have a symref
"FOO_HEAD" that points to a ref "refs/heads/bar" that does not exist,
and we try to write to it with a create operation like:
oid=$(git rev-parse HEAD) ;# or whatever
git symbolic-ref FOO_HEAD refs/heads/bar
echo "create FOO_HEAD $oid" | git update-ref --stdin
The attempt to resolve FOO_HEAD will actually resolve "bar", yielding
the null oid. That matches our expectation, and the write proceeds. This
is correct, because we are not writing FOO_HEAD at all, but writing its
destination "bar", which in fact does not exist.
But what if the operation asked not to dereference symrefs? Like this:
echo "create FOO_HEAD $oid" | git update-ref --no-deref --stdin
Resolving FOO_HEAD would still result in a null oid, and the write will
proceed. But it will overwrite FOO_HEAD itself, removing the fact that
it ever pointed to "bar".
This case is a little esoteric; we are clobbering a symref with a
no-deref write of a regular ref value. But the same problem occurs when
writing symrefs. For example:
echo "symref-create FOO_HEAD refs/heads/other" |
git update-ref --no-deref --stdin
The "create" operation asked us to create FOO_HEAD only if it did not
exist. But we silently overwrite the existing value.
You can trigger this without using update-ref via the fetch
followRemoteHEAD code. In "create" mode, it should not overwrite an
existing value. But if you manually create a symref pointing to a value
that does not yet exist (either via symbolic-ref or with "remote add
-m"), create mode will happily overwrite it.
Instead, we should detect this case and refuse to write. The correct
specification to overwrite FOO_HEAD in this case is to provide an
expected target ref value, like:
echo "symref-update FOO_HEAD refs/heads/other ref refs/heads/bar" |
git update-ref --no-deref --stdin
Note that the non-symref "update" directive does not allow you to do
this (you can only specify an oid). This is a weakness in the update-ref
interface, and you'd have to overwrite unconditionally, like:
echo "update FOO_HEAD $oid" | git update-ref --no-deref --stdin
Likewise other symref operations like symref-delete do not accept the
"ref" keyword. You should be able to do:
echo "symref-delete FOO_HEAD ref refs/heads/bar"
but cannot (and can only delete unconditionally). This patch doesn't
address those gaps. We may want to do so in a future patch for
completeness, but it's not clear if anybody actually wants to perform
those operations. The symref update case (specifically, via
followRemoteHEAD) is what I ran into in the wild.
The code for the fix is relatively straight-forward given the discussion
above. But note that we have to implement it independently for the files
and reftable backends. The "old oid" checks happen as part of the
locking process, which is implemented separately for each system. We may
want to factor this out somehow, but it's beyond the scope of this
patch. (Another curiosity is that the messages in the reftable code are
marked for translation, but the ones in the files backend are not. I
followed local convention in each case, but we may want to harmonize
this at some point).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These tests set config within a sub-repo using (cd two && git config),
and then a separate test_when_finished outside the subshell to clean it
up. We can't use test_config to do this, because the cleanup command it
registers inside the subshell would be lost. Nor can we do it before
entering the subshell, because the config has to be set after some other
commands are run.
Let's switch these tests to use "git -C" for each command instead of a
subshell. That lets us use test_config (with -C also) at the appropriate
part of the test. And we no longer need the manual cleanup command.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Several tests in t5510 do a bare "cd subrepo", not in a subshell. This
changes the working directory for subsequent tests. As a result, almost
every test has to start with "cd $D" to go back to the top-level.
Our usual style is to do per-test environment changes like this in a
subshell, so that tests can assume they are starting at the top-level
$TRASH_DIRECTORY.
Let's switch to that style, which lets us drop all of that extra
path-handling.
Most cases can switch to using a subshell, but in a few spots we can
simplify by doing "git init foo && git -C foo ...". We do have to make
sure that we weren't intentionally touching the environment in any code
which was moved into a subshell (e.g., with a test_when_finished), but
that isn't the case for any of these tests.
All of the references to the $D variable can go away, replaced generally
with $PWD or $TRASH_DIRECTORY (if we use it inside a chdir'd subshell).
Note in one test, "fetch --prune prints the remotes url", we make sure
to use $(pwd) to get the Windows-style path on that platform (for the
other tests, the exact form doesn't matter).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Several tests set a config variable in a sub-repo we chdir into via a
subshell, like this:
(
cd "$D" &&
cd two &&
git config foo.bar baz
)
But they also clean up the variable with a when_finished directive
outside of the subshell, like this:
test_when_finished "git config unset foo.bar"
At first glance, this shouldn't work! The cleanup clause cannot be run
from the subshell (since environment changes there are lost by the time
the test snippet finishes). But since the cleanup command runs outside
the subshell, our working directory will not have been switched into
"two".
But it does work. Why?
The answer is that an earlier test does a "cd two" that moves the whole
test's working directory out of $TRASH_DIRECTORY and into "two". So the
subshell is a bit of a red herring; we are already in the right
directory! That's why we need the "cd $D" at the top of the shell, to
put us back to a known spot.
Let's make this cleanup code more explicitly specify where we expect the
config command to run. That makes the script more robust against running
a subset of the tests, and ultimately will make it easier to refactor
the script to avoid these top-level chdirs.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Mention the --force option earlier
- Remove the explanation of shell globbing vs git's internal glob
system, since users are confused by it and there's a clearer
discussion in the EXAMPLES section.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Add a basic example of how "git add" is normally used
- It's not technically true that you *must* use the `add` command to
add changes before running `git commit`, because `git commit -a`
exists. Instead say that you *can* use the `add` command.
- Mention early on that "index" is another word for "staging area",
since Git very rarely uses the word "index" in its output
(`git status`) uses the term "staged", and many Git users are
unfamiliar with the term "index"
- Remove "It typically adds" (it's not clear what "typically" means),
and instead mention that `git add -p` can be used to add
partial contents
- Currently the introduction is somewhat repetitive ("to prepare the
content staged for the next commit" ... "this snapshot that is taken
as the contents of the next commit."), replace with a single sentence
("The "index" [...] is where Git stores the contents of the next
commit.")
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The changes added by 39fc408562 (t/t1517: automate `git subcmd -h` tests
outside a repository, 2025-08-08) to automatically loop over all "main"
Git commands will, when run against an installed build using
GIT_TEST_INSTALLED rather than the build in the build directory, include
some extra git-gui commands that are installed by `make install`, or
credential helpers that might be installed manually from the contrib
directories. These fail the test, so record them as such.
Signed-off-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When describing a blob, we search for it by traversing from HEAD. We do
this by feeding the name HEAD to setup_revisions(). But if we are on an
unborn branch, this will fail with a confusing message:
$ git describe $blob
fatal: ambiguous argument 'HEAD': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
It is OK for this to be an error (we cannot find $blob in an empty
traversal, so we'd eventually complain about that). But the error
message could be more helpful.
Let's resolve HEAD ourselves and pass the resolved object id to
setup_revisions(). If resolving fails, then we can print a more useful
message.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If describe_blob() does not find the blob in question, it returns an
empty strbuf, and we print an empty line. This differs from
describe_commit(), which always either returns an answer or calls die()
itself. As the blob function was bolted onto the command afterwards, I
think its behavior is not intentional, and it is just a bug that it does
not report an error.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We pass a "struct object_id" to describe_blob() by value. This isn't
wrong, as an oid is composed only of copy-able values. But it's unusual;
typically we pass structs by const pointer, including object_ids. Let's
do so.
It similarly makes sense for us to hold that pointer in the callback
data (rather than yet another copy of the oid).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
xdl_hash_record_verbatim uses modified djb2 hash with XOR instead of ADD
for combining. The ADD-based variant is used as the basis of the modern
("GNU") symbol lookup scheme in ELF. Glibc dynamic loader received an
optimized version of this hash function thanks to Noah Goldstein [1].
Switch xdl_hash_record_verbatim to additive hashing and implement
an optimized loop following the scheme suggested by Noah.
Timing 'git log --oneline --shortstat v2.0.0..v2.5.0' under perf, I got
version | cycles, bn | instructions, bn
---------------------------------------
A 6.38 11.3
B 6.21 10.89
C 5.80 9.95
D 5.83 8.74
---------------------------------------
A: baseline (git master at e4ef0485fd78)
B: plus 'xdiff: refactor xdl_hash_record()'
C: and plus this patch
D: with 'xdiff: use xxhash' by Phillip Wood
The resulting speedup for xdl_hash_record_verbatim itself is about 1.5x.
[1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20220519221803.57957-6-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add the --format flag to git-repo-info. By using this flag, the users
can choose the format for obtaining the data they requested.
Given that this command can be used for generating input for other
applications and for being read by end users, it requires at least two
formats: one for being read by humans and other for being read by
machines. Some other Git commands also have two output formats, notably
git-config which was the inspiration for the two formats that were
chosen here:
- keyvalue, where the retrieved data is printed one per line, using =
for delimiting the key and the value. This is the default format,
targeted for end users.
- nul, where the retrieved data is separated by NUL characters, using
the newline character for delimiting the key and the value. This
format is targeted for being read by machines.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is part of the series that introduces the new subcommand
git-repo-info.
The flag `--is-shallow-repository` from git-rev-parse is used for
retrieving whether the repository is shallow. This way, it is used for
querying repository metadata, fitting in the purpose of git-repo-info.
Then, add a new field `layout.shallow` to the git-repo-info subcommand
containing that information.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is part of the series that introduces the new subcommand
git-repo-info.
The flag --is-bare-repository from git-rev-parse is used for retrieving
whether the current repository is bare. This way, it is used for
querying repository metadata, fitting in the purpose of git-repo-info.
Then, add a new field layout.bare to the git-repo-info subcommand
containing that information.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is part of the series that introduces the new subcommand
git-repo-info.
The flag `--show-ref-format` from git-rev-parse is used for retrieving
the reference format (i.e. `files` or `reftable`). This way, it is
used for querying repository metadata, fitting in the purpose of
git-repo-info.
Add a new field `references.format` to the repo-info subcommand
containing that information.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, `git rev-parse` covers a wide range of functionality not
directly related to parsing revisions, as its name suggests. Over time,
many features like parsing datestrings, options, paths, and others
were added to it because there wasn't a more appropriate command
to place them.
Create a new Git command called `repo`. `git repo` will be the main
command for obtaining the information about a repository (such as
metadata and metrics).
Also declare a subcommand for `repo` called `info`. `git repo info`
will bring the functionality of retrieving repository-related
information currently returned by `rev-parse`.
Add the required documentation and build changes to enable usage of
this subcommand.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As part of 9bbc981c6f2 (t/unit-tests: finalize migration of
reftable-related tests, 2025-07-24), the explicit list of
`UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS` was turned into a wildcard pattern-derived list.
Let's do the same in the CMake definition.
This fixes build errors with symptoms like this:
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:132 (string):
string sub-command REPLACE requires at least four arguments.
Call Stack (most recent call first):
CMakeLists.txt:1037 (parse_makefile_for_scripts)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Edit: We are continuing to follow the existing PO file convention, which
includes filenames but strips out line numbers from the file-location
comments. This standard was set by our former lead, Jordi Mas, and we
are maintaining it for project-wide consistency.
Signed-off-by: Mikel Forcada <mikel.forcada@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
